Monthly Markets Review - February 2022
Monthly Markets Review - February 2022
The month in summary:
“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February shocked the world and is having a significant humanitarian impact. There are economic and financial implications too, and markets tumbled as investors assessed the potential economic impact of sanctions on Russia - a key exporter of commodities.
"The UK was the best performing market because of its high exposure to the energy and materials sectors. Meanwhile, European equities were the worst performer – a possible consequence of the region’s heavy dependency on Russian energy imports.” Sean Markowicz, Schroders Strategic Research Unit.
US stocks fell in February, as investors tried to process the implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The US imposed a broad range of severe sanctions on Russia after the invasion. The US has banned transactions with the Russian central bank and, in collaboration with other major governments, has sought to stop it from deploying foreign reserves. Restrictions have been placed on the nation’s key financial institutions – including Sberbank and VTB - as well as its wealthiest individuals and families. The US has also cut Russia out of the Swift International Payments System, along with similar exclusions from the system by other major economic powers.
Beyond these events, the US economic picture remained broadly unchanged. US growth continues to look robust while inflation is elevated. Industrial activity – as represented by the flash composite purchasing managers’ index (PMI) - rose to 56 this month from 51.1 in January. US inflation, released early in the month, surprised to the upside. Headline CPI rose to 7.5% year on year in January; the fastest pace since 1982. Rising prices are a key contributor to weaker consumer confidence. (The PMI indices, produced by IHS Markit, are based on survey data from companies in the manufacturing and services sectors. A reading above 50 signals expansion.)
Most areas of the market struggled in February. Energy was the only sector to make gains, with oil and gas prices increasing steeply. All other sectors declined. The tech and communication services sectors were among the weakest.
Eurozone shares fell in February, underperforming other regions. Europe has a significant reliance on Russian energy, especially gas, and the invasion saw energy prices spike higher. The consumer discretionary and financials sectors were the worst performers, reflecting expectations for pressure on consumer spending and economic activity as energy prices rise. More defensive sectors such as healthcare, communication services and utilities were among the better performers but all sectors saw losses.
The eurozone’s annual inflation rate was confirmed at 5.1% in January, up from 5.0% in December 2021. Of this, energy price inflation accounted for more than half of the rise. Early in February, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde had declined to rule out an interest rate rise this year in response to higher inflation. However, the Ukraine crisis may now make it less likely that the central bank would tighten monetary policy.
The European Union and individual European countries announced sanctions on Russia and policy changes as a result of the unfolding crisis. These included a commitment by Germany to increase its defence spending. Germany also suspended the approval of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.
Elsewhere, indicators of economic activity remained robust. The flash Markit composite purchasing managers’ index for February was 55.8, up from 52.3 in January and a five-month high. The services sector continued its rebound as activity such as tourism picked up following the loosening of Covid restrictions.
UK equities were broadly unchanged over February. The picture was very similar to January, with shares of larger companies rising. This was driven this month by the mining, healthcare and oil sectors, while small and mid cap equities recorded losses. One change from January was a greater presence of more traditionally defensive sectors among the market’s outperforming areas. These included consumer goods, drinks and utility companies, to take three examples.
Consensus earnings growth estimates for UK quoted companies remained steady in February. Many companies reassured the market on their forecasts as they published full-year results. This was despite concerns that the full impact of inflationary trends are yet to be factored into profit margin expectations.
The latest monthly GDP data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that UK output contracted by 0.2% in the month of December as restrictions were re-introduced following the rise in Covid-19 cases linked to the Omicron variant. Despite this, the estimated fall in activity was less severe than feared by the consensus among economists, which had predicted a drop of 0.6%. The Bank of England raised interest rates by 0.25 percentage points, to 0.5%, as the ONS revealed that the consumer price index rose by 5.5% in the 12 months to January, a 30-year high.
After an initial recovery from January’s weakness, the Japanese stock market ended February with a loss of 0.4%. The yen ended the month little changed against the US dollar, although there was some underlying strength in the second half of the month as global uncertainty increased.
Geopolitical events dominated equity market behaviour in February. Any direct impact on Japan is likely to be limited, though this assessment is not intended to trivialise the scale of human suffering in Ukraine itself. As we have seen many times in the past, Japan’s stock market reflected global market moves. The principal conduit for such uncertainty is often seen through the currency as the yen maintains its traditional role as a safe-haven asset.
Russia is a relatively small trading partner for Japan, accounting for around 1% of exports and 2% of imports. The balance is skewed by the import of energy from Russia, especially LNG, while exports are predominantly in auto-related areas. Most auto makers are now moving to suspend these links. Some Japanese companies, especially the large trading companies, have production assets based in Russia, but these generally account for less than 1% of their global exposure. Technology-related trade between the two countries is very small.
The Ukraine crisis implies energy prices could remain higher for longer than previously anticipated. This is likely to provide a boost to long-term inflationary expectations in Japan, at just the same time as the substantial negative impact of lower mobile phone charges begins to drop out of the year-on-year inflation data. As a result, we could see a temporary rise in inflation, approaching the Bank of Japan’s 2% target, happening slightly earlier than previously expected.
Asia (ex Japan)
Asia ex Japan equities recorded a modest decline in February following a volatile month on global stock markets after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine towards the end of the month. News that Russian president Vladimir Putin had put the country’s nuclear forces on high alert intensified fears that the conflict could escalate, weakening investor sentiment further.
Stocks in China and Hong Kong slipped as US and European countries started to impose economic sanctions on Russia, leading to commodity price rises and fresh concerns over higher inflation. In Hong Kong, technology stocks declined due to new concerns over changing regulatory rules in China.
Stocks in India also ended the month in the red amid weak investor sentiment due to the crisis in Ukraine. Share prices in Taiwan were lower, with a mixed performance from financial and technology stocks, while prices in Singapore also ended the month in the red. Despite periods of volatility during the month, share prices in Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand ended the month in positive territory.
Emerging market (EM) equities registered a negative return in February as geopolitical tensions took centre stage. Russian equities and the rouble plummeted as President Putin launched a full-scale invasion of neighbouring Ukraine. Risk aversion impacted other emerging European markets, specifically Hungary and Poland which also fell sharply. Egypt, which is likely to see some economic impact through the loss of tourist revenues from Russian and Ukrainian visitors, underperformed the broader EM index.
Rising energy prices as a result of Russia’s war in Ukraine were a headwind for net EM importers, notably India which also lagged. China underperformed by a smaller margin. Conversely, Peru was the best-performing index market, benefitting from stronger metals prices, along with Brazil and South Africa. Net oil exporters, particularly the UAE, but also Colombia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, all generated positive returns and outperformed. Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand all recorded strong gains. Taiwan posted a negative return but finished ahead of the broader index.
February was ultimately overshadowed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the threat of a major regional conflict, dire humanitarian consequences and ramifications for the global political order. Sanctions imposed by the West have essentially cut Russia off from the global financial system. The final days of the month saw heightened volatility as markets began to absorb the enormity of the situation.
Bond yields were volatile, finishing slightly higher due to moves earlier in the month. Yields initially rose sharply (meaning prices fell) on further hawkish surprises from central banks. With the market already assuming aggressive tightening in the US, moves by the European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of England (BoE) exacerbated investor concerns. ECB comments indicated it could raise rates toward the end of the year and the BoE hiked rates a second time, despite concerns around the economic outlook.
Yields than began to decline from around mid-month as geopolitical tensions increased, with further downward moves in the days following the invasion.
The US 10-year Treasury yield was up from 1.78% to 1.82%, briefly rising above 2%, while the equivalent UK yield rose from 1.31% to 1.41% and Germany’s from 0.01% to 0.16%.
In the short-end of the curve, the US 2-year yield rose from 1.18% to 1.44%, with an intra-month high of 1.6% coinciding with the day of the invasion. The UK’s 2-year yield was unchanged at 1.05%, but hit 1.56% mid-month. The 2-year Bund yield initially lurched from -0.53% toward -0.2%, but finished the month little changed.
Corporate bonds saw negative returns, Europe in particular, as spreads widened. The US performed relatively well, notably high yield where there was modest spread tightening in some sectors, including energy.
Emerging market (EM) bonds saw negative total returns, selling off in the final days of the month. Hard currency sovereign bonds were worst affected. In foreign exchange markets, Latin America currencies and some in Asia held on to gains for the month, despite a late sell-off. Central and eastern European currencies weakened. The Russian rouble was almost 40% lower as severe economic sanctions were imposed. Investment grade bonds are the highest quality bonds as determined by a credit rating agency; high yield bonds are more speculative, with a credit rating below investment grade.
Convertible bonds, as measured by the Refinitiv Global Focus Index, shed -1.9% in US dollar terms. In a typical reaction to lower equity prices, the primary market for convertibles remained subdued with an issuance volume of just $2.9 billion. Convertible bond valuations moved sideways with some cheapening in US convertibles.
The S&P GSCI Index recorded a strong rise in February, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Agriculture was the best performing component of the index, with strong gains for wheat and Kansas wheat. Russia and Ukraine account for around 30% of global wheat exports. Corn and soybeans achieved more modest gains. The energy component also achieved solid gains in February, with strong price rises for crude oil and Brent crude.
In the industrial metals component, aluminium, nickel and lead all achieved strong gains, while price gains for copper and zinc were more muted. Gold and silver both ended the month in positive territory, highlighting gold’s safe haven status for many investors during times of stock market turmoil.
The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.
This document is marketing material. This document is provided by the author and may not necessarily represent views expressed in other Benchmark Capital communications, strategies or funds. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested. Exchange rate changes may cause the value of any overseas investments to rise or fall. The sectors, securities, regions and countries shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Benchmark Capital does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Aspect8 has to its customers under any regulatory system. MSCI: Third party data is owned or licensed by the data provider and may not be reproduced or extracted and used for any other purposes without the data provider’s consent. Third party data is provided without any warranties of any kind. The data provider and issuer of the document shall have no liability in connection with the third party data. FTSE: FTSE International Limited (‘FTSE’) © FTSE 2019. ‘FTSE®’ is a trade mark of London Stock Exchange Plc and The Financial Times Limited and is used by FTSE International Limited under licence. All rights in the FTSE indices and or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent. Regions/sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. This content is issued by Benchmark Capital, Holmwood House, Broadlands Business Campus, Langhurstwood Road, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 4QP.