IN FOCUS6-8 min read

Quarterly markets review - Q1 2023

A look back at markets in Q1 when stocks rose despite turmoil in the banking sector.

Photo of San francisco Bay bridge

The quarter in summary:

Global equities gained in Q1, buoyed by receding recession worries in developed markets. Gains came despite the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, which caused significant volatility in bank shares. Growth stocks outperformed value in the quarter. In fixed income, government bond yields were fell (meaning prices rose).

Please note any past performance mentioned is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The sectors, securities, regions and countries shown are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.


The short-lived market turbulence that followed the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in March did not prevent investor optimism leading US stocks higher over the quarter. The Federal Reserve (Fed) raised rates twice, and data indicated that inflation is cooling, leading to expectations the hiking cycle could shortly come to an end.

The collapse of SVB, followed shortly by further financial sector disruption in Europe, caused stocks to dip sharply in March before recovering to finish the month and quarter higher. The Fed expressed confidence in the resilience of the US banking system and raised the policy rate by 25 basis points in both February and March. This took borrowing costs to the highest point since 2007. However, inflation – as measured by the core personal consumption expenditure (PCE) index – climbed less than expected in March, leading to speculation that further rate hikes will be limited.

The financial sector, perhaps surprisingly, largely shrugged off the events surrounding SVB as investors concluded that the systemic risk was minimal. It was stocks in the energy and healthcare sectors which lagged the most over the quarter. Tech stocks made some of the strongest gains.


Eurozone shares notched up strong gains in Q1 despite volatility in the banking sector. Gains were led by the information technology, consumer discretionary and communication services sectors. Laggards were real estate and energy.

Financials had a turbulent time in March following the failure of US lender Silicon Valley Bank. A week later, troubled lender Credit Suisse was bought by UBS in a deal brokered by the Swiss authorities. However, the eurozone financials sector posted gains for the quarter overall, with Credit Suisse’s problems largely seen as being contained. The real estate sector saw significant falls amid worries over higher financing costs and weaker occupancy rates.

The European Central Bank raised interest rates by 50 basis points in both February and March. Eurozone inflation declined to a one-year low in March. Consumer prices rose by 6.9%, down from 8.5% in February. However, core inflation (excluding food and energy costs) rose to 5.7% from 5.6%. The Markit flash purchasing managers’ index reached a 10-month high of 54.1 in March, although growth was powered by the service sector with the manufacturing index below 50. (The PMI indices are based on survey data from companies in the manufacturing and services sectors. A reading below 50 indicates contraction, while above 50 signals expansion.)

In France, government plans to raise the retirement age saw extensive protests across the country. President Macron’s government narrowly survived a no-confidence vote over the issue.


UK equities rose over the quarter. Economically sensitive areas outperformed, in line with other markets. This occurred amid hopes that central banks might be in a position to ‘pivot’ to cutting interest rates in late 2023. Industrials outperformed as did the consumer discretionary sector. The latter reflected a very strong recovery in many domestically focused areas. These bounced back as it transpired the UK economy had performed resiliently during the energy crisis.

The latest quarterly GDP data from the Office for National Statistics revealed that the UK economy had not contracted in Q4 2022, contrary to consensus expectations. As a result, the economy dodged a technical recession by avoiding two consecutive quarters of decline (following the contraction recorded for Q3 2022). In its latest quarterly forecasts, the Bank of England (BoE) said it still expected the country to fall into a recession later in 2023.

The recession, however, is expected be shallower than the BoE had been predicting at the time of striking its previous forecasts back in November 2022. Since that time, wholesale energy prices have fallen considerably as the European energy crisis has abated. The BoE’s Monetary Policy Committee voted to continue to raising interest rates as inflation remained the main concern. Inflation proved stronger than expected, in part due to the resilience of the domestic economy.


Japanese stocks rose strongly in Q1 with the Topix up 7.2% in yen terms. Throughout January, investors’ attention remained focused on the Bank of Japan (BoJ), following the surprise adjustment to the yield curve control policy which was announced in mid-December. Contrary to investors’ speculation, BoJ governor Mr Kuroda left policy unchanged at the January policy meeting. Discussion moved to the policy stance of new governor, Mr Kazuo Ueda, who is scheduled to replace Mr Kuroda in early April.

Quarterly earnings results announced from late January to mid February were mixed. Exporters had a difficult time due to yen appreciation during Q4 2022, and a slowdown in production mainly affecting technology sectors. Domestically-oriented companies recorded better-than-expected sales numbers but suffered from cost increases, including the electricity price hike.

In March, the turmoil triggered by SVB’s collapse and the bailout of Credit Suisse by UBS dragged down market sentiment. Japanese financial stocks were severely hit by concerns. However, the market rebounded toward the end of the month. Yen weakness supported cyclical stocks.

Tokyo Stock Exchange was expected to announce its guidance to urge companies with a price-to-book ratio of below 1 to make plans to boost corporate value. The guidance has attracted global attention to Japan, especially for those stocks announcing enhanced shareholder remuneration.

Asia (ex Japan)

Asia ex Japan equities recorded a positive performance in the first quarter, with strong gains by Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea offsetting weaker performances by Hong Kong, India and Malaysia.

Chinese shares achieved robust gains at the start of the quarter after Beijing loosened its Covid-19 restrictions that had constrained the country’s economic growth. Supportive property market measures and a loosening of the regulatory crackdown on China’s technology companies also bolstered investor sentiment.

South Korea and Taiwan achieved robust gains in January, while India ended the month in negative territory, amid a sell off by foreign investors and investor caution as economic growth stalled.

Fears of a global recession weakened investor sentiment towards the region in February, with Thailand, Malaysia and South Korea experiencing sharp falls as investors took profits following a strong performance in January on investor optimism sparked by China’s reopening.

However, equities were broadly higher in March, with all index markets achieving a positive performance as fears of market contagion following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank eased.

Emerging markets

Emerging markets (EM) posted positive returns over the quarter, but lagged the MSCI World Index. The start of the year brought with it renewed optimism about EM, given the re-opening of China’s economy. However, February and March saw US-China tensions re-escalate and a widespread loss of confidence in US and European banks. Central banks continued to raise interest rates, with US rates reaching their highest level since 2007 in March.

The best-performing market was the Czech Republic. Mexico outperformed against a backdrop of improving economic data while Taiwan and Korea were beneficiaries of optimism about global growth. Peru, Indonesia and Chile outperformed too.

China was ahead of the index. Although US-China tensions resurfaced during the quarter following the shooting down of a Chinese high altitude balloon in US airspace, optimism about the re-opening of the economy and an apparent easing of regulatory pressure on the internet sector were positive for the market.

South Africa lagged the index with Poland and Thailand behind too. South Africa continues to suffer from the electricity crisis. The country was also was ‘grey-listed’ in February by the Financial Action Task Force given deficiencies in its processes to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.

Brazil was down in dollar terms against a backdrop of softening economic data and anti-government riots that damaged government buildings in January. India generated negative returns amid allegations of fraud and share price manipulation at a major conglomerate early in the quarter. Economic data released over the period was also below consensus.

Global bonds

The first quarter of the year began with positive sentiment on the growth outlook as energy costs fell and China’s economy reopened. But there was also evidence that the encouraging inflation picture was starting to reverse as core inflation measures ticked higher once more. However, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in mid-March dwarfed concerns over re-accelerating inflation and prompted a sharp rally in government bond markets.

As markets reacted to fears of a banking crisis, government bond markets went from pricing in rate hikes to discounting sizeable rate cuts in some markets.

During Q1, growth improved as headwinds from higher inflation on consumers’ real incomes, stemming from energy prices, started to abate. While there were signs that hiking cycles were already biting (particularly in housing markets), the full spill-over effects to the broader economy are yet to come. Core measures of CPI delivered upside surprises to inflation in both the US and Europe.

Central banks continued with their interest rate hikes, though some adjusted their stance. The Federal Reserve (Fed) announced two rate hikes in the quarter of 25bps each, marking a slowdown. The Bank of England (BoE) approved two rate hikes of 50bps and 25bps, respectively. The European Central Bank (ECB) remained more hawkish by comparison and hiked rates twice in 50bps increments.

The Bank of Canada enacted a rate hike of 25bps but signalled a pause immediately upon doing so, while the Bank of Japan (BoJ) made no further adjustments to its yield curve control policy, despite core inflation rising. The BoJ also appointed a new governor, a development markets are assessing for any implications for monetary policy, particularly with respect to yield curve control.

Against this backdrop markets have been volatile with widening credit spreads. US and European investment grade posted positive returns towards quarter end, but high yield was negative with poor performance from the banking sector dominating. Investment grade bonds are the highest quality bonds as determined by a credit rating agency; high yield bonds are more speculative, with a credit rating below investment grade.

The US 10-year yield fell from 3.92% to 3.47%, with the two-year going from 4.82% to 4.03%. Germany’s 10-year yield decreased from 2.65% to 2.29%. The UK 10-year yield fell from 3.71% to 3.49% and two-year decreased from 4.07% to 3.44%.

The US dollar was weaker against most G-10 peers, driven by changes in rate hike expectations. (G-10 currencies are ten major currencies used in international markets).

Convertibles could only partially benefit from the tailwind provided by equity market gains. The Refinitiv Global Focus convertible bond index advanced 2.9% in US dollar terms. Convertibles protected well from losses in February and again during the days when liquidity in the financial sector dried up. However, the asset class only participated in 40% of the equity upside. Total new issuance volume stands at US$22.5 billion for the first quarter – a sharp contrast to the record lows of last year.


The S&P GSCI Index recorded a negative performance in the first quarter. Energy and livestock were the worst-performing components of the index, while precious metals and industrial metals achieved price gains. Within energy, prices for natural gas, gas oil and heating oil were all sharply lower. In precious metals, gold achieved a robust price gain while silver achieved a more modest price uplift. Within industrial metals, the price of nickel was sharply lower in the first quarter, while the decline in the price of lead was more muted. Copper and aluminium prices both advanced in the quarter.

The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.

Table of equity returns Q1 2023Table of fixed income returns Q1 2023

Important information

The views and opinions contained herein are those of Benchmark Financial Planning. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Benchmark Financial Planning communications, strategies or funds and are subject to change. This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable, but Benchmark Financial Planning does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The data has been sourced by Benchmark Financial Planning and should be independently verified before further publication or use. No responsibility can be accepted for error of fact or opinion. Benchmark Financial Planning is not responsible for the accuracy of the information contained within linked sites. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past Performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.

Issued by Benchmark Financial Planning Limited. An Appointed Representative of Best Practice IFA Group Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, the registration number is 223112. Registered office: Broadlands Business Campus, Langhurst Wood Road, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 4QP. Registered in England and Wales No 07572431.


Benchmark Financial Planning is an Appointed Representative of Best Practice IFA Group Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, the registration number is 223112. Registered office: Broadlands Business Campus, Langhurst Wood Road, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 4QP. Registered in England and Wales No 07572431.

The Financial Ombudsman Service is available to sort out individual complaints that clients and financial services businesses aren't able to resolve themselves. To contact the Financial Ombudsman Service, please visit

The guidance and/or advice contained within this website are subject to the UK regulatory regime and are therefore targeted at consumers based in the UK.